Atnaujinta: 2024.11.27 04:27 (GMT+2)
SAMPO PANK
COMMENTARY TO FINANCIAL RESULTS
AUDITED BUSINESS RESULTS OF SAMPO BANK GROUP 2000
Balance sheet analysis
At year-end 2000, the Sampo Bank Group had total assets of EEK 4.3 billion, a
rise of 23.4 per cent, or EEK 820.0 million, generated largely by an increase
in client deposits and debt securities issued.
Securities and liquid assets
Liquid assets grew faster than total assets, comprising 38.7 per cent of the
total by year-end 2000, compared to 30.1 per cent the prior year. Demand and
time deposits with other banks rose 56.4 per cent, or EEK 293.7 million, while
claims on the Central Bank increased 56.3 per cent, or EEK 190.2 million. The
liquidity buffer bond portfolio amounted to EEK 272.5 million at year-end
2000, a gain of EEK 158.5 million, or 138.8 per cent, which mainly reflects
acquisitions of foreign credit institution and central government debt
securities. Total liquid assets increased EEK 618.9 million, or 58.7 per cent,
over the year, amounting to EEK 1.7 billion at year-end 2000.
Group investments in shares declined in 2000 by 64.9 per cent, or EEK 79.4
million, due, largely, to a fall of 65.4 per cent, or EEK 63.8 million, in the
equity investment portfolio.
The bond investment portfolio of the Group achieved an increase of 32.8 per
cent, or EEK 31.8 million. Acquisitions of financial mediator debt securities
comprised 79.1 per cent, or EEK 101.9 million, of the portfolio at year-end
2000.
Lending
Group loans to clients represent the largest assets group. At year-end 2000,
the gross loan portfolio accounted for 56.6 per cent of interest earning
assets (64.5 per cent at year-end 1999) and 52.6 per cent of total assets
(55.5 per cent in 1999). The gross loan portfolio had a gain of 17.0 per cent,
or EEK 330.0 million, in 2000 to EEK 2.3 billion.
Outstanding private company loans totalled EEK 1.9 billion at year-end 2000,
an increase of 9.6 per cent, or EEK 163.1 million. By economic sectors,
outstanding loans grew fastest in manufacturing and whole sale and retail
trade, by EEK 199.4 million, or 33.0 per cent, and EEK 42.8 million, or 16.2
per cent, respectively.
Loans to private persons experienced a considerable rise of 53.0 per cent, or
EEK 116.5 million, to EEK 336.2 million.
At year-end 2000, the loan portfolio was comprised 82.0 per cent of loans to
private companies and 14.8 per cent of loans to private persons. The leasing
portfolio represented 20.9 per cent of the loan portfolio, increasing by EEK
219.8 million, or 86.6 per cent, over the year.
Based on loans outstanding, group credit grants by economic sectors (incl.
funds lent to other credit institutions) were largest to the financial sector
(28.6 per cent of total credits), followed by manufacturing (26.1 per cent),
the real estate, rental and financial services sectors (21.6 per cent), and
wholesale and retail trade (10.0 per cent).
At year-end 2000, the reserve for possible loan losses represented 4.5 per
cent of the gross loan portfolio, compared to 7.4 per cent in 1999. During
2000, uncollectible loans were written off at EEK 96.7 million, while EEK 19.5
million was recovered from the write-offs of previous years. Loan provisions
made in 2000 totalled EEK 51.3 million, a decrease of EEK 29.8 million, or
36.8 per cent, over 1999. The quality of the loan portfolio improved due to a
fall in the share of overdue loans, from 3.1 per cent of the gross loan
portfolio in 1999 to 0.9 per cent by year-end 2000. Overdue loans comprised
20.9 per cent of the reserve for possible loan losses in 2000, compared to
41.5 per cent at year-end 1999.
Diversification of the loan portfolio improved significantly. While clients’
liabilities with high risk concentration represented 173.5 per cent of net own
funds the prior year, the respective share was only 45.8 per cent at year-end
2000.
Group interest earning assets had a gain of EEK 1.0 billion, or 33.4 per cent.
Other assets
Intangible assets declined by EEK 107.5 million, explained largely by full
amortisation of goodwill in 2000. Amortisation of intangible assets totalled
EEK 110.9 million, with EEK 108.6 relating to the write-off of goodwill.
The decrease in tangible assets reflects amortisation as well as sales of
disposable real estate. Tangible assets declined 21.0 per cent, or EEK 41.2
million, over the year. The share of intangible and tangible assets in group
total assets fell from 8.8 per cent at year-end 1999 to 3.7 per cent at year-
end 2000.
Funding
The Group’s business is principally funded through client deposits, debt
securities issued, and loans from other banks. In the year under review,
client deposits and debt securities issued rose by EEK 519.0 million, or 35.8
per cent, and EEK 229.1 million, or 45.2 per cent, respectively, while loans
from other banks decreased by EEK 248.7 million, or 32.5 per cent. Total
interest bearing liabilities increased by EEK 485.2 million, or 16.1 per cent,
amounting to EEK 3.501 billion at year-end 2000.
Group profit earning possibilities are significantly influenced by the type,
maturity, and stability of funds borrowed. Group interest bearing liabilities
were comprised 56.2 per cent, or EEK 2.0 billion, of client deposits, the
largest funding source, 21.0 per cent, or EEK 735.4 million, of debt
securities issued, 14.7 per cent, or EEK 515.7 million, of loans from other
banks and 5.6 per cent, or EEK 194.5 million, of subordinated debts.
Client deposits
Client deposits have achieved highest growth for two years running. Group
client deposits total jumped by EEK 519.0 million, or 35.8 per cent, over the
year, compared to a rise of EEK 590.2 million, or 68.6 per cent, in 1999.
While in 1999 increase mainly resulted from an upswing in demand deposits, the
rise in 2000 reflects a strong inflow of time deposits. Time deposits gained
89.2 per cent, or EEK 445.2 million, with demand deposits rising by 7.8 per
cent, or EEK 73.8 million.
The significant rise in interest rates in the US and Euro areas in 2000 added
attractiveness to long-term saving. Which explains the expressive rise in time
deposits, a popular facility in 2000 among individuals as well as private
companies. Growth in deposits was principally generated by time deposits held
by individuals and private companies, jumping 116.6 per cent, or EEK 200.8
million, and 57.4 per cent, or EEK 150.8 million, respectively, over the year.
Private company deposits represented the largest weight of 64.0 per cent of
the total in 2000, compared to 75.6 per cent in 1999. The fall in the overall
importance of these deposits (with growth of 15.0 per cent over the year) is
explained by a higher rise of 92.5 per cent in deposits held by private
persons.
Growth in client current account balances slowed down from EEK 417.2 million,
or 78.1 per cent, in 1999 to EEK 73.8 million in 2000, reflecting a hgh
increase in time deposits.
Private person demand deposits gained 51.6 per cent, or EEK 52.3 million, and
private company demand deposits climbed 1.6 per cent, or EEK 13.3 million.
Of total deposits, 52.0 per cent, or EEK 1.0 billion, was derived from demand
deposits and 48.0 per cent, or EEK 944.1. million, from time deposits.
Debt securities issued and loans from other banks
During the year, total debt securities issued by the companies of the Group
increased by 45.2 per cent, or EEK 229.1 million, to EEK 735.4 million. The
average remaining maturity was one year at year-end 2000. Debt securities
issued formed the second largest interest bearing liabilities group after
client deposits, representing 21.0 per cent of this total at year-end 2000.
Deutsche Bank arranged Sampo Bank’s EUR 30 million issue of 1-year bonds
towards the end of 2000. The coupon rate is the 3-month Euribor + 110 basis
points.
Sampo Bank repaid DEM 11.25 million and USD 30 million of previously issued
debt securities at the beginning of 2000 due to redemption dates.
At year-end 2000, loans from other banks totalled EEK 511.1 million, a decline
of EEK 210.6 million, or 29.2 per cent, over the year, reflecting expiration
dates and the related regular payments.
Equity restructuring
A prerequisite for the Sampo Group in carrying out its strategic goals,
meeting its clients’ demands for financial services, and realising its
development ambitions is sufficient capitalisation. The balance sheet goodwill
total was fully written off towards the end of 2000 in line with an equity
restructuring plan approved by the Supervisory Board of Sampo Bank. Full
amortisation of goodwill will improve the Bank’s 2001 profitability by EEK 28
million.
The Extraordinary Meeting of the Shareholders of the Bank on 18 December,
2000, decided to cover the loss for previous periods by reducing the share
capital by EEK 172.4 million and by using the accumulated share premium in the
amount of EEK 60.6 million.
At year-end 2000, group equity stood at EEK 240.4 million, or 5.6 per cent, of
total assets, compared to 9.1 per cent in December 1999. Capital adequacy,
which represents sufficiency of bank own funds for covering banking related
risks, was 13.4 per cent at the end of the year.
Income Statement analysis
The Sampo Bank Group reported a loss of EEK 77.0 million, reflecting
finalisation of goodwill amortisation in 2000. Group operating profit before
amortisation of goodwill amounted to EEK 31.7 million in 2000.
Group return on equity in the year under review was -24.4 percent (-6.1 per
cent in 1999) and group return on assets was -2.1 per cent (-0.6 per cent in
1999).
In 2000, group fees and commissions income achieved highest growth of 27.4 per
cent, or EEK 16.1 million, while foreign exchange income gained 22.1 per cent,
or EEK 8.2 million, and interest income rose 9.2 per cent, or EEK 21.2
million. Group total income in 2000 was EEK 380.9 million, a decline of 5.1
per cent compared to the prior year, owing to a fall in income from
transactions in securities.
Of 2000 total income, 65.7 per cent was derived from interest income, 19.6 per
cent from fees and commissions, 11.9 per cent from foreign exchange
transactions, and 3.6 per cent from other sources. In 2000, transactions in
securities resulted in a loss of EEK 3.4 million.
Of the Group’s companies, AS Sampo Liising and AS Optiva Kinnisvara made
highest profits of EEK 9.5 million and EEK 6.0 million, respectively. AS Sampo
Liising offers its clients financing facilities through traditional lease
products. AS Optiva Kinnisvara manages the Group’s real estate.
Interest income and expenses
In 2000, total interest income of the Sampo Bank Group totalled EEK 250.4
million, a rise of 9.2 per cent over the year. Interest income on loans and
interest income on capital and operating leases accounted for 61.4 per cent
and 18.0 per cent, respectively, of earned interest income. The rise in
interest income mainly resulted from an increase in interest earning assets.
Average interest earning assets had a gain of 18.1 per cent over the year. In
2000, average interest return on interest earning assets was 8.2 per cent, a
decline of 0.7 percentage points, reflecting the fall in the average interest
rate in Estonia due to positive developments of the economic environment.
In 2000, interest expenses totalled EEK 126.8 million, a decline of 6.7 per
cent, explained by changes in the structure of interest bearing liabilities
(i.e. a rise in the share of funds payable on demand) and a fall in the
interest rate paid on funds borrowed. Given that the jump in time deposits and
debt securities issued only took place toward the end of 2000, the share of
demand deposits in average interest bearing liabilities was 11.3 percentage
points higher. Interest paid on demand deposits, thus, rose to 10.9 per cent
of interest expenses (from 7.9 per cent in 1999), while the share of interest
paid on fixed-term funds experienced a decline. Interest expenses on interest
bearing liabilities were 4.5 per cent (compared to 5.1 per cent in 1999).
Net interest income totalled EEK 123.7 million in 2000, compared to EEK 93.4
million, an increase of 32.4 per cent. In 2000, group interest spread was 3.7
per cent and group interest margin represented 3.4 per cent. Net interest
margin after provisions was 2.0 per cent in 2000, compared to 0.3 per cent in
1999.
Non-interest income
Group non-interest income totalled EEK 130.5 million in 2000, a decline of
24.2 per cent, or EEK 41.7 million, over the year, reflecting smaller than
1999 income from securities transactions.
In 1999, the Group earned an extraordinary income from securities
transactions. Making use of advantageous changes in the market, the Group made
a prior repurchase of issued debt securities at a profit. In 2000, the short-
term securities investment and trading portfolio yielded a profit of EEK 6.1
million (EEK 45.5 million in 1999), while the long-term investment portfolio
produced a loss of EEK 9.1 million (compared to a profit of EEK 3.5 million in
1999).
The non-interest income structure of the Group experienced a rise in income
from traditional banking businesses. In 2000, fees and commissions income and
foreign exchange income represented the biggest shares of 57.2 per cent and
34.8 per cent, respectively, of total non-interest income (compared to 34.0
per cent and 21.6 per cent in 1999). In the year under review, these non-
interest income sources also produced highest growth rates of 27.4 per cent
and 22.1 per cent, respectively. Income growth was generated by a rise in
clients’ business activity as well as by an increase in the number of clients
and their banking operations.
Non-interest expenses
Group non-interest expenses grew in line with increasing business volumes. In
2000, non-interest expenses rose 9.6 per cent to EEK 14.4 million.
Fees and commissions expenses increased EEK 5.7 million, or 38.0 per cent,
over the year, reflecting a rise in clients’ operations.
Group operating expenses increased 6.4 per cent, or EEK 8.6 million, over the
year. Personnel expenses, including salaries, bonuses, fringe benefits and
social security payments, totalled EEK 74.2 million and represented the
biggest share in group non-interest expenses in 2000. Group personnel expenses
were 6.8 per cent, or EEK 4.7 million, higher than the prior year.
The largest expense items in other administrative expenses were communication
and data processing expenses (comprising 32.6 per cent of this total) and room
rent and administration expenses (23.8 per cent of this total). Communication
and data processing expenses increased EEK 2.3 million, or 14.0 per cent, and
room rent and administration expenses grew EEK 2.5 million, or 22.5 per cent,
over the year.
Ruth Laidvee
Turukommunikatsiooni direktor
6 302 181